Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 17(1): 1888-1896, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32417070

RESUMO

Background: Community pharmacies provide an important healthcare service, which is broadly established, and constitutes the preferred and initial contact for members of the community. The significant value of community pharmacies was further highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Objective: The assessment of community pharmacies preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional interview survey of 1018 community pharmacies working in four regions of Egypt (South, East, Centre, and North). Data collection was conducted from 8-19 April 2020. Results: Availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and medication was better than alcohol (70% conc.). Home delivery services were available in 49.1% of pharmacies. Infection control measures covering interactions between staff were in place in up to 99.5% of pharmacies. Conversely, there was less frequent availability of contactless payment (29.1%), hand sanitizers (62.1%) or masks (86.5%) for customer use, or a separate area for patients with suspected COVID-19 (64%). Verbal customer education (90.4%) was used preferably to written (81.3%). Despite high clinical knowledge and awareness (97.6%-99.2%), only 8.8% of pharmacists had reported suspected COVID-19 cases, however this varied significantly with pharmacist demographics (geographic region P < 0.001; pandemic training p < 0.001; position p = 0.019; age p = 0.046). Conclusions: Government and policymakers strive to mitigate the shortage of PPE and medication. More attention should be given to infection control measures around interactions between staff and customers to ensure community pharmacists are fit and able to provide continuity in their important role. Educating customers using regularly-updated posters, banners or signs will contribute to decreasing contact with patients, and reducing the number and duration of visits to the pharmacy. Pandemic preparedness of community pharmacists must also extend to reporting procedures. By avoiding under-reporting or over-reporting, community pharmacists will contribute to accurate monitoring of the national spread of infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Farmacêuticos/provisão & distribuição , Papel Profissional , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Estudos Transversais , Egito/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/tendências , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/tendências , Farmacêuticos/tendências
2.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(10): ajpe7889, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33149327

RESUMO

The annual number of Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates is projected to exceed the number of annual pharmacist job openings over the next 10 years. Loss of retail sector jobs will be partially offset by projected gains in several other sectors; however, oversupply will persist until the number of graduates is more reflective of job market capacity. Large-scale practice transformation will not happen overnight; consequently, schools and colleges of pharmacy must immediately change their perspective from producing graduates to fill pharmacist roles, to producing graduates who are prepared with expertise and professional skills to excel in many types of well-paying positions. Students need career advice including to convince potential employers how a PharmD education has prepared them with transferable high-level skills that are applicable beyond traditional pharmacist roles. Better communicating the value of pharmacy skills to students and employers may also have a positive impact on admission numbers as prospective applicants become more aware of the breadth of pharmacy career opportunities.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Educação em Farmácia , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Farmacêuticos/provisão & distribuição , Estudantes de Farmácia , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Mão de Obra em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Descrição de Cargo , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Rev Bras Epidemiol ; 23: e200028, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32401921

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of hypertension in Brazil and worldwide has been increasing in recent decades, and drug therapy is one of the strategies used to control this condition. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of use and identify the sources for obtaining antihypertensive drugs in Brazil, according to sociodemographic variables, comparing three periods: 2011, 2014 and 2017. METHODS: Data from individuals aged ≥20 years who reported a medical diagnosis of hypertension, interviewed by Vigitel in 2011, 2014 and 2017 were used. Frequency and prevalence of drug use in addition to the sources for obtaining medication were estimated by sociodemographic variables, with 95% confidence intervals. The differences between proportions were verified by Pearson's chi-square test (Rao-Scott), with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The prevalence of antihypertensive drug use remained stable (80%). Regarding the sources for obtaining these medicines, there was variation in the period, indicating a decrease in usage through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) (44.2% in 2011; 30.5% in 2017). This decrease was accompanied with increase in PFPB (16.1% in 2011; 29.9% in 2017). The prevalence of other sources for obtaining medicine (private pharmacies/drugstores) showed stability in the period. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of medication use remained high and there was a change in the pattern of use according to sources, demonstrating migration between SUS pharmacies to the PFPB, and suggesting a reduction in the availability of medicines from public pharmacies universally, and for free.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/provisão & distribuição , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Brasil/epidemiologia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Prevalência , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Telefone , Adulto Jovem
4.
Rev. bras. epidemiol ; 23: e200028, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1101599

RESUMO

RESUMO: Objetivo: A prevalência de hipertensão arterial no Brasil e no mundo vem aumentando nas últimas décadas, sendo o uso de medicamentos uma das estratégias utilizadas no controle da doença. O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a prevalência de uso e identificar as fontes de obtenção de anti-hipertensivos no Brasil, segundo variáveis sociodemográficas, comparando três períodos: 2011, 2014 e 2017. Métodos: Foram utilizados dados de indivíduos com idade ≥20 anos que referiram diagnóstico médico de hipertensão arterial, entrevistados pelo Vigitel nos anos de 2011, 2014 e 2017. Foi estimada a distribuição de frequências e as prevalências de uso de medicamentos, segundo variáveis sociodemográficas, de acordo com as fontes de obtenção, com intervalos de confiança de 95%. As diferenças entre as proporções foram verificadas pelo teste χ2 de Pearson (Rao-Scott), com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: A prevalência de uso manteve-se estável (80%). Quanto às fontes de obtenção observou-se variação no período, indicando diminuição na obtenção por meio das Unidades de Saúde do SUS (44,2% em 2011; 30,5% em 2017). Esse decréscimo esteve acompanhado do aumento na obtenção pela Farmácia Popular (16,1% em 2011; 29,9% em 2017). A prevalência de obtenção por meio de farmácias privadas/drogarias mostrou estabilidade no período. Conclusões: A prevalência de uso de medicamentos se manteve alta e houve modificação no padrão de utilização segundo fontes de obtenção, evidenciando migração entre Unidades de Saúde do SUS para a Farmácia Popular, sugerindo redução da disponibilidade dos medicamentos pelas farmácias públicas de forma universal e gratuita.


ABSTRACT: Objective: The prevalence of hypertension in Brazil and worldwide has been increasing in recent decades, and drug therapy is one of the strategies used to control this condition. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of use and identify the sources for obtaining antihypertensive drugs in Brazil, according to sociodemographic variables, comparing three periods: 2011, 2014 and 2017. Methods: Data from individuals aged ≥20 years who reported a medical diagnosis of hypertension, interviewed by Vigitel in 2011, 2014 and 2017 were used. Frequency and prevalence of drug use in addition to the sources for obtaining medication were estimated by sociodemographic variables, with 95% confidence intervals. The differences between proportions were verified by Pearson's chi-square test (Rao-Scott), with a significance level of 5%. Results: The prevalence of antihypertensive drug use remained stable (80%). Regarding the sources for obtaining these medicines, there was variation in the period, indicating a decrease in usage through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) (44.2% in 2011; 30.5% in 2017). This decrease was accompanied with increase in PFPB (16.1% in 2011; 29.9% in 2017). The prevalence of other sources for obtaining medicine (private pharmacies/drugstores) showed stability in the period. Conclusions: The prevalence of medication use remained high and there was a change in the pattern of use according to sources, demonstrating migration between SUS pharmacies to the PFPB, and suggesting a reduction in the availability of medicines from public pharmacies universally, and for free.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Anti-Hipertensivos/provisão & distribuição , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Telefone , Brasil/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Entrevistas como Assunto , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Distribuição por Sexo , Distribuição por Idade , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico
5.
Isr J Health Policy Res ; 7(1): 59, 2018 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30501624

RESUMO

The community pharmacy setting is a venue that is readily accessible to the public. In addition, it is staffed by a pharmacist, who is a healthcare provider, trained and capable of delivering comprehensive pharmaceutical care. As such, community pharmacists have a colossal opportunity to serve as key contributors to patients' health by ensuring appropriate use of medications, preventing medication misadventures, identifying drug-therapy needs, as well as by being involved in disease management, screening, and prevention programs. This unique position gives the pharmacist the privilege and duty to serve patients in roles other than solely that of the stereotypical drug dispenser.Worldwide, as well as in Israel, pharmacists already offer a variety of pharmaceutical services and tend to patients' and the healthcare system's needs. This article provides examples of professional, clinical or other specialty services offered by community pharmacists around the world and in Israel and describes these interventions as well as the evidence for their efficacy. Examples of such activities which were recently introduced to the Israeli pharmacy landscape due to legislative changes which expanded the pharmacist's scope of practice include emergency supply of medications, pharmacists prescribing, and influenza vaccination. Despite the progress already made, further expansion of these opportunities is warranted but challenging. Independent prescribing, as practiced in the United Kingdom or collaborative drug therapy management programs, as practiced in the United States, expansion of vaccination programs, or wide-spread recognition and reimbursement for medication therapy management (MTM) programs are unrealized opportunities. Obstacles such as time constraints, lack of financial incentives, inadequate facilities and technology, and lack of professional buy-in, and suggested means for overcoming these challenges are also discussed.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Israel , Papel Profissional , Mecanismo de Reembolso
6.
Am J Public Health ; 108(9): 1191-1196, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30024793

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To improve public health surveillance and response by using spatial optimization. METHODS: We identified cases of suspected nonfatal opioid overdose events in which naloxone was administered from April 2013 through December 2016 treated by the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. We used spatial modeling to identify areas hardest hit to spatially optimize naloxone distribution among pharmacies in Pittsburgh. RESULTS: We identified 3182 opioid overdose events with our classification approach, which generated spatial patterns of opioid overdoses within Pittsburgh. We then used overdose location to spatially optimize accessibility to naloxone via pharmacies in the city. Only 24 pharmacies offered naloxone at the time, and only 3 matched with our optimized solution. CONCLUSIONS: Our methodology rapidly identified communities hardest hit by the opioid epidemic with standard public health data. Naloxone accessibility can be optimized with established location-allocation approaches. Public Health Implications. Our methodology can be easily implemented by public health departments for automated surveillance of the opioid epidemic and has the flexibility to optimize a variety of intervention strategies.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Melhoria de Qualidade , Alocação de Recursos/normas , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Epidemias , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Naloxona/provisão & distribuição , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/provisão & distribuição , Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , População Urbana
7.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 54(4): e00143, 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001575

RESUMO

Although dispensing of medication has been addressed by theoretical models, studies that confirm the impact of this service are still needed. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a new model of medicine dispensing system on patients' medication knowledge, adherence to treatment and satisfaction. One hundred and four patients attending the dispensing service of a community pharmacy between 21 January 2013 and 20 April 2013 were included in this intervention study. The impact of the service on patients' medication knowledge, adherence to treatment and satisfaction was assessed by using validated questionnaires at two time points: at the moment of medication dispensing and 30 days thereafter by telephone contact. Statistical analysis was performed by McNemar's test, and a p<0.05 was set as statistically significant. The number of patients showing insufficient knowledge about medications decreased by 50% (p < 0.05), and the number of those showing sufficient knowledge was three times greater (p < 0.05) after medicine dispensing. A high level of satisfaction was observed. Improvement of medication adherence, however, was not observed. The proposed system model for drug dispensing improved patients' knowledge about medication and satisfaction


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Farmácias/classificação , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Boas Práticas de Dispensação , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição
8.
BMC Nephrol ; 18(1): 305, 2017 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969602

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prescribing policy recommendations aimed at moving immunosuppressant prescribing for renal transplant patients from primary to secondary care may result in benefits of increased safety and reduced cost. However, there is little evidence of patients' preferences for receiving their immunosuppressant therapy from hospitals compared to community dispensing. The aim of this study was to elicit patient preferences for different service configurations focusing in particular on home delivery versus collection of medication from hospital. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was administered to 265 renal transplant patients in North Wales. Respondents were presented 18 pairwise choices, labelled as either home delivery or hospital collection, and described by the attributes: frequency of supply, waiting time (for delivery or collection) and method of ordering (provider contact, patient contact via phone, patient contact electronically). Data were analysed using a random-effects logit model and marginal rates of substitution calculated based on the waiting time attribute. RESULTS: A response rate of 63% was achieved, with 5332 usable observations from 150 respondents. Method of delivery (ß coefficient 1.21; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.38), frequency of supply (0.05; 0.03 to 0.08) waiting time (-0.00, -0.00 to -0.00), provider contact (desirable) (0.20; 0.12 to 0.27), patient contact by telephone (desirable) (0.09; 0.01 to 0.17) and patient contact electronically (undesirable) (-0.292; -0.37 to -0.21) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Results indicate that patients are willing to increase waiting time by nearly 10 h to have a home delivery service. CONCLUSION: Patients indicate a clear preference for a home delivery service. They prefer providers to make contact when new immunosuppressant supplies are required and show preference against ordering medication electronically. A policy for secondary care prescribing and hospital collection of medicines does not align with this preference.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Imunossupressores/provisão & distribuição , Transplante de Rim , Preferência do Paciente , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/métodos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários , País de Gales/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(10): 653-668, 2017 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28377378

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Results of a study to determine if disparities in drug pricing, pharmacy services, and community pharmacy access exist in a Tennessee county with a predominantly minority population are reported. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of community pharmacies in Shelby County, a jurisdiction with a total population more than 60% composed of racial and ethnic minority groups, was conducted. Data collection included "out-of-pocket" (i.e., cash purchase) prices for generic levothyroxine, methylphenidate, and hydrocodone-acetaminophen; pharmacy hours of operation; availability of selected pharmacy services; and ZIP code-level data on demographics and crime risk. Analysis of variance, chi-square testing, correlational analysis, and data mapping were performed. RESULTS: Survey data were obtained from 90 pharmacies in 25 of the county's 33 residential ZIP code areas. Areas with fewer pharmacies per 10,000 residents tended to have a higher percentage of minority residents (p = 0.031). Methylphenidate pricing was typically lower in areas with lower employment rates (p = 0.027). Availability of home medication delivery service correlated with income level (p = 0.015), employment rate (p = 0.022), and crime risk (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: A survey of community pharmacies in Shelby County, Tennessee, found that areas with a high percentage of minority residents had lower pharmacy density than areas with a high percentage of white residents. Pharmacies located in communities with low average income levels, low employment rates, and high scores for personal crime risk were less likely to offer home medication delivery services.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Acetaminofen/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Hidrocodona/economia , Metilfenidato/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tennessee , Tiroxina/economia
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(Suppl 4): 806, 2017 12 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29297404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While quick and easy access to healthcare services is a reality for some, others experience significant hardships, even for receipt of the most basic health and medical care and attention. To those who effectively have been shut out of the healthcare marketplace due largely to economic deficiencies, healthcare providers engaged in the delivery of charitable services are a critical lifeline. Myriad attempts by governmental entities to remedy disparate access and shore up the delivery of healthcare services directed toward the disadvantaged have failed to close gaps, warranting pursuit of novel methods that offer potential and the hope that sufficient access might one day become a reality. DISCUSSION: One innovative approach for enhancing and improving charitable healthcare endeavors in communities was developed by Willis-Knighton Health System. The initiative, known as the Tithing the Bottom Line program, essentially takes a portion of the health system's earnings and directs these resources to fund pursuits that improve quality of life in the community, with the enhancement of health and wellness services for the underprivileged being a top priority. These resources magnify the efforts of establishments already endeavoring to serve those in need and create powerful synergies which positively impact the health status of disadvantaged populations. To shed light on Willis-Knighton Health System's unique charitable initiative, this article describes its tithing program in detail, supplying operational guidance that will permit healthcare institutions to establish like programs in their communities. CONCLUSIONS: With healthcare access gaps remaining pronounced despite numerous attempts by governmental entities to realize full access, grassroots efforts remain critical to bolster health and wellness broadly in communities. Deficiencies carry dramatic consequences for both the disadvantaged and the greater communities in which they reside. The synergistic, cooperative effort realized by Willis-Knighton Health System's tithing program offers great potential for reducing healthcare disparities, yielding healthier populations, enhanced opportunities, and better communities.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Instalações de Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Populações Vulneráveis , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Comportamento Cooperativo , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Instalações de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Objetivos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Estados Unidos
11.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 56(5): 533-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pharmacy density in rural and urban communities with hospitals and to examine its association with readmission rates. DESIGN: Ecologic study. SETTING: Forty-eight rural and urban primary care service areas (PCSAs) in the state of Oregon. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitals in the state of Oregon. INTERVENTION: Pharmacy data were obtained from the Oregon Board of Pharmacy based on active licensure. Pharmacy density was calculated by determining the cumulative number of outpatient pharmacy hours in a PCSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oregon hospital 30-day all-cause readmission rates were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and were determined with the use of claims data of patients 65 years of age or older who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days from July 2012 to June 2013. RESULTS: Readmission rates for Oregon hospitals ranged from 13.5% to 16.5%. The cumulative number of pharmacy hours in PCSAs containing a hospital ranged from 54 to 3821 hours. As pharmacy density increased, the readmission rates decreased, asymptotically approaching a predicted 14.7% readmission rate for areas with high pharmacy density. CONCLUSION: Urban hospitals were in communities likely to have more pharmacy access compared with rural hospitals. Future research should determine if increasing pharmacy access affects readmission rates, especially in rural communities.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Idoso , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Oregon , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/organização & administração
12.
Rev Saude Publica ; 50: 74, 2016 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28099664

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the costs of public pharmaceutical services compared to Farmácia Popular Program (Popular Pharmacy Program). METHODS: Comparison between prices paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program (Farmácia Popular is available here) with the full costs of medicine provision by the Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. The comparison comprised 25 medicines supplied by both the municipal pharmaceutical service and Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program. Calculating the cost per pharmaceutical unit of each medicine included expenditure by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with procurement (price), logistics, and local dispensation. The reference price of medicines paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular was taken from the Brazilian Ministry of Health standard in force in 2012. Comparisons included full reference price; reference price minus 10.0% copayment by users; and maximum reference paid by the Ministry of Health (minus copayment and taxes). Simulations were carried out of the differences between the costs of Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with the common medicines and those potentially incurred based on the reference price of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTS: The Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro spent R$28,526,526.57 with 25 medicines of the common list in 2012; 58.7% accounted for direct procurement costs. The estimated costs of the Health Department were generally lower than the reference prices of the Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program for 20 medicines, regardless of reference prices. The potential costs incurred by Health Department if expenditure of its consumption pattern were based on the reference prices of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular would be R$124,170,777.76, considering the best scenario of payment by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (90.0% of the reference price, minus taxes). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in costs between public provision by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro and Farmácia Popular Program indicates that some reference prices could be reviewed aiming at their reduction. OBJETIVO: Analisar custos da assistência farmacêutica pública frente ao Programa Farmácia Popular. MÉTODOS: Comparação entre os valores pagos pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular com os custos integrais relativos à provisão de medicamentos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro. A comparação compreendeu 25 medicamentos, comuns tanto à provisão pela assistência farmacêutica pública municipal quanto pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. O cálculo do custo unitário por unidade farmacotécnica de cada medicamento envolveu os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde com custos de aquisição (preço), logísticos e com a dispensação em nível local. O valor de referência dos medicamentos pago pelo Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular foi extraído da norma ministerial em vigor em 2012. As comparações envolveram o valor de referência pleno; valor de referência com desconto dos 10,0% pagos de contrapartida pelos usuários; e valor de referência máximo pago pelo Ministério da Saúde (descontados contrapartida e sem impostos).Foram realizadas simulações das diferenças entre os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro com os medicamentos do elenco comum e os que seriam incorridos se esses tivessem sido executados com base no valor de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTADOS: A Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro gastou R$28.526.526,57 com 25 medicamentos do rol comum em 2012; 58,7% corresponderam a custos diretos com a aquisição dos produtos. Os custos estimados da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro foram, em geral, menores que os valores de referência do Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular em 20 medicamentos, independentemente dos valores de referência. Os custos que seriam incorridos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, caso seu padrão de consumo tivesse como valor de pagamento os valores de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular seriam de R$124.170.777,76 considerando a melhor situação de pagamento pelo Ministério da Saúde (90,0% do valor de referência, com impostos descontados). CONCLUSÕES: A diferença de custos entre a provisão pública pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro e o Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular sinaliza que alguns valores de referência poderiam ser objetos de exame para sua redução.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Brasil , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Custos e Análise de Custo , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Setor Público
13.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 50: 74, 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-962230

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the costs of public pharmaceutical services compared to Farmácia Popular Program (Popular Pharmacy Program). METHODS Comparison between prices paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program (Farmácia Popular is available here) with the full costs of medicine provision by the Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro. The comparison comprised 25 medicines supplied by both the municipal pharmaceutical service and Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program. Calculating the cost per pharmaceutical unit of each medicine included expenditure by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with procurement (price), logistics, and local dispensation. The reference price of medicines paid by Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular was taken from the Brazilian Ministry of Health standard in force in 2012. Comparisons included full reference price; reference price minus 10.0% copayment by users; and maximum reference paid by the Ministry of Health (minus copayment and taxes). Simulations were carried out of the differences between the costs of Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro with the common medicines and those potentially incurred based on the reference price of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTS The Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro spent R$28,526,526.57 with 25 medicines of the common list in 2012; 58.7% accounted for direct procurement costs. The estimated costs of the Health Department were generally lower than the reference prices of the Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular Program for 20 medicines, regardless of reference prices. The potential costs incurred by Health Department if expenditure of its consumption pattern were based on the reference prices of Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular would be R$124,170,777.76, considering the best scenario of payment by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (90.0% of the reference price, minus taxes). CONCLUSIONS The difference in costs between public provision by Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro and Farmácia Popular Program indicates that some reference prices could be reviewed aiming at their reduction.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar custos da assistência farmacêutica pública frente ao Programa Farmácia Popular. MÉTODOS Comparação entre os valores pagos pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular com os custos integrais relativos à provisão de medicamentos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro. A comparação compreendeu 25 medicamentos, comuns tanto à provisão pela assistência farmacêutica pública municipal quanto pelo Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. O cálculo do custo unitário por unidade farmacotécnica de cada medicamento envolveu os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde com custos de aquisição (preço), logísticos e com a dispensação em nível local. O valor de referência dos medicamentos pago pelo Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular foi extraído da norma ministerial em vigor em 2012. As comparações envolveram o valor de referência pleno; valor de referência com desconto dos 10,0% pagos de contrapartida pelos usuários; e valor de referência máximo pago pelo Ministério da Saúde (descontados contrapartida e sem impostos).Foram realizadas simulações das diferenças entre os gastos da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro com os medicamentos do elenco comum e os que seriam incorridos se esses tivessem sido executados com base no valor de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular. RESULTADOS A Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro gastou R$28.526.526,57 com 25 medicamentos do rol comum em 2012; 58,7% corresponderam a custos diretos com a aquisição dos produtos. Os custos estimados da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro foram, em geral, menores que os valores de referência do Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular em 20 medicamentos, independentemente dos valores de referência. Os custos que seriam incorridos pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, caso seu padrão de consumo tivesse como valor de pagamento os valores de referência do Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular seriam de R$124.170.777,76 considerando a melhor situação de pagamento pelo Ministério da Saúde (90,0% do valor de referência, com impostos descontados). CONCLUSÕES A diferença de custos entre a provisão pública pela Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro e o Programa Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular sinaliza que alguns valores de referência poderiam ser objetos de exame para sua redução.


Assuntos
Humanos , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/provisão & distribuição , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Brasil , Gastos em Saúde , Setor Público , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Custos e Análise de Custo , Programas Nacionais de Saúde
14.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(4): 405-12, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115460

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare availability of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in pharmacies in St. Louis, MO. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, on-site store audits of 322 pharmacies. SETTING: St. Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: 242 eligible community pharmacies located in the study area. INTERVENTION: Pharmacies were visited by trained research assistants who conducted a 5- to 10-minute store audit using a paper-based data collection tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability, accessibility, and pricing of NRT as a function of neighborhood poverty rate and proportion of black residents as well as availability of tobacco products and e-cigarettes. RESULTS: NRT availability decreased as neighborhood poverty rate increased (P = 0.02). Availability without pharmacy personnel assistance also decreased with increasing poverty rate (r = -0.19; 95% CI = -0.06, -0.31) and higher percentage of black residents (r = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.06, -0.31). Prices were lower in neighborhoods with higher poverty rates (P = 0.02) and a higher percentage of black residents (P = 0.03). E-cigarettes were available in 43% of pharmacies, and their availability and price did not differ by poverty rate or percentage of black residents. CONCLUSION: Low access to NRT might perpetuate smoking disparities in disadvantaged and racially diverse neighborhoods. Study data support policies to ensure equal NRT access to reduce disparities.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Agonistas Nicotínicos/provisão & distribuição , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Produtos do Tabaco/provisão & distribuição , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/provisão & distribuição , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Estudos Transversais , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Missouri/epidemiologia , Agonistas Nicotínicos/economia , Pobreza , Características de Residência , Fumar/economia , Fumar/etnologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/etnologia , Produtos do Tabaco/economia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/economia , Saúde da População Urbana
15.
J Hum Lact ; 31(4): 577-81, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25829476

RESUMO

Well Babies at Walgreens is a unique community-based corporate partnership program that offers breastfeeding support by a lactation professional in a private room at the pharmacy. Walgreens is a community pharmacy chain with more than 8000 locations in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. The primary goal of Well Babies is to support breastfeeding women using a model that is expandable to other Walgreens pharmacy sites. The Well Babies program offers drop-in services, with a professional consultation by a lactation consultant and baby weight check, if desired. Well Babies creators are developing a business plan for Walgreens and a toolkit that would help other stores implement the program. An additional goal is to improve continuity of care for breastfeeding by engaging pharmacists as vital members of the health care team. Offering breastfeeding support at a pharmacy improves access and encourages support persons to attend while simultaneously allowing the family to complete other errands. This initiative included education for pharmacists to improve the recommendations they make for breastfeeding mothers and to improve awareness among pharmacists of the benefits associated with breastfeeding and the need to preserve the breastfeeding relationship. The first drop-in location opened in April 2012. Grant funding from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, awarded to the Indiana State Department of Health, made it possible to open a second drop-in location in June 2013. Future plans include developing an employee lactation program and expanding Well Babies at Walgreens at other store locations.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Promoção da Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Indiana , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cuidado Pós-Natal/organização & administração , Gravidez , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos
16.
Health Policy ; 119(5): 628-39, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747809

RESUMO

Community pharmacists are the third largest healthcare professional group in the world after physicians and nurses. Despite their considerable training, community pharmacists are the only health professionals who are not primarily rewarded for delivering health care and hence are under-utilized as public health professionals. An emerging consensus among academics, professional organizations, and policymakers is that community pharmacists, who work outside of hospital settings, should adopt an expanded role in order to contribute to the safe, effective, and efficient use of drugs-particularly when caring for people with multiple chronic conditions. Community pharmacists could help to improve health by reducing drug-related adverse events and promoting better medication adherence, which in turn may help in reducing unnecessary provider visits, hospitalizations, and readmissions while strengthening integrated primary care delivery across the health system. This paper reviews recent strategies to expand the role of community pharmacists in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Scotland, and the United States. The developments achieved or under way in these countries carry lessons for policymakers world-wide, where progress thus far in expanding the role of community pharmacists has been more limited. Future policies should focus on effectively integrating community pharmacists into primary care; developing a shared vision for different levels of pharmacist services; and devising new incentive mechanisms for improving quality and outcomes.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Gerenciamento Clínico , Farmacêuticos , Papel Profissional , Austrália , Atenção à Saúde , Europa (Continente) , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Motivação , América do Norte
17.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(1): 59-66, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25575150

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact that Charitable Pharmacy of Central Ohio (CPCO), a pharmacy providing free pharmacy services and medications, had on an indigent patient population by determining the change in patient-reported hospital use, ability to access medications, and perception of health status after receiving CPCO services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with face-to-face interviews using a convenience sample. SETTING: Columbus, OH, in January to March 2013. PATIENTS: 206 English-speaking patients 18 years or older at CPCO. INTERVENTION: Free pharmacy services and medications provided by CPCO. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Number of patient-reported hospital visits before and after CPCO use. RESULTS: In the year before using CPCO, patients reported using the hospital a mean of 2.36 (median, 2.00) times per year versus 1.33 (median, 0.67) times per year after, a decrease of 1.03 hospital visits per year per patient. Before coming to CPCO, 41% of patients were able to have all of their prescribed medications filled; this rose to 85% after using CPCO. A total of 89% of patients reported that not only was their overall health was better, but they also had a better understanding of their medications and believed they were in more control of their own health since receiving CPCO services. CONCLUSION: A charitable pharmacy model has the potential to decrease health care costs and empower patients to be more in control of their health.


Assuntos
Instituições de Caridade , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Hospitalização , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Caridade/economia , Instituições de Caridade/tendências , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Medicamentos , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Indigência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio , Participação do Paciente , Percepção , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Poder Psicológico , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
18.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2012 5): 1-5, 2013 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399456

RESUMO

Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance ("sole community pharmacy"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Farmacêutica/provisão & distribuição , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Medicare Part D/economia , Propriedade/economia , Características de Residência , População Rural , Estados Unidos
19.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2013 11): 1-4, 2013 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399462

RESUMO

Local rural pharmacies provide essential pharmacy and clinical services to their communities. Pharmacists play a critical role in the continuum of care for rural residents, and the loss of a local pharmacy may impact access to prescription drugs and clinical care. This policy brief identifies factors that contributed to the closing of six pharmacies and describes how the affected communities adapted to losing locally based services. Key Findings. (1) Five out of the six pharmacies studied closed due to retirement and/or difficulties in recruiting a successor. (2) In five of the six communities, residents now either drive to the nearest pharmacy or use mail-order to receive their prescriptions and, in some instances, receive their prescriptions through a courier service from a pharmacy in a nearby town. (3) Access to pharmacy services in these communities is of most concern for individuals with limited mobility and those who lack a support system that can pick up and deliver their prescriptions (e.g., the elderly and people with acute conditions).


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Humanos , Farmácias/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Estados Unidos
20.
Rural Policy Brief ; (2013 15): 1-4, 2013 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399463

RESUMO

Key Findings. Twenty-five counties lost their sole community pharmacy between May 2006 and December 2010. Among these: (1) The average population density is 10.4 persons per square mile, compared to 87.4 for the United States. (2) The average population decreased by 1.6% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the average decrease was 2.4%. (3) The population age 65 years and older increased 5.4% between 2000 and 2010. Excluding the largest county, the 65-and-older population increased 2.1%. (4) The average change in the percentage of persons in poverty increased by 0.6 points between 2000 and 2010, from 15.5% to 16.1%, compared to a 4.0 point increase (11.3% to 15.3%) for the United States. (5) The average percentage of people younger than 65 years without health insurance was 24.6% in 2010, compared to 16.2% for the United States. (6) Nineteen of the 25 counties were designated "whole county" Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), meaning there was a shortage of primary medical care physicians across the entire county. (7) The average number of active doctors per 1,000 persons was 0.44, compared to 2.86 for the United States. Six of the 25 counties (24%) had no active MDs or DOs in 2010.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/provisão & distribuição , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/tendências , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição , Farmácias/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Demografia , Previsões , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/tendências , Farmácias/economia , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Pobreza , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/tendências , População Rural , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA